Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49768 (KAR)

SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/1379/2024 · 2026-01-13

D K Singh, S Rachaiah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1976-DB WA No. 1379 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO. 1379 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA D/O. LATE VENKATAIAHA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 2. SRI. VENKATESH S/O. LATE VENKATAIAHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 3. SMT. ANUSUYAMMA D/O. LATE VENKATAIAHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 4. SMT. GOWRAMMA D/O LATE VENKATAIAHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 5. SRI. BASAVARAJU S/O LATE VENKATAIAHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF THOTAGERE VILLAGE, DASANPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN 3 563 123. &APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DEEPAK M, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1976-DB WA No. 1379 of 2024 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 3 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU 3 560 001. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BANGALORE URBAN 3 560 001. 4. SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O PUJAPPA @ PUJAYYA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDENT OF THOTAGERE VILLAGE, DASAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK 3 563 123. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 05.06.2024 IN WP No-23493/2023 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1976-DB WA No. 1379 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. No one has appeared even on the revised call. Therefore, we have no option but to dismiss this writ appeal for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, this writ appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. All pending applications stands disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1