Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49752 (MAD)

Mr. JOTHI LOGANATHAN v. DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER - II

WP/25508/2026 · 2026-07-15

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25508 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 25508 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.27814 of 2026 Mr. JOTHI LOGANATHAN Proprietor of Jothi Stores SF No.232/4, Gandhi Road, Banavaram, Ranipet -632505 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy State Tax Officer - II Arakkonam Assessment Circle Ward-B, Block No.25, Ts No.22 Gandhi Road, Arakkonam 631001. 2. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (GST Appeal), Vellore, No. 4, Bharathiyar Salai, Fort Round Road, Vellore - 632001. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of 1st respondent in Ref. No ZD331225374246G dated 24-12-2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially remand back by directing the 1st Respondent for passing a fresh Order after consideration of the explanation of the Petitioner and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr.Malola Narasimhan V.S. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25508 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** ORDER An order dated 24.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25508 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. Deputy State Tax Officer - II Arakkonam Assessment Circle Ward-B, Block No.25, Ts No.22 Gandhi Road, Arakkonam 631001. 2. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (GST Appeal), Vellore No. 4, Bharathiyar Salai, Fort Round Road, Vellore - 632001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25508 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 25508 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.27814 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis