Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4975 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35654/2026 · 2026-09-08

Indrajeet Shukla, Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35654 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. The only prayer made to direct the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar/ Respondent No.3 to pass appropriate order on the representation dated 08.06.2026 submitted by the petitioner against the application issued by the State-Government dated 13.10.2022. 2. It is argued by the learned Standing Counsel that Respondent No.3 will take a decision in the matter, expeditiously. 3. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.3 namely District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, to pass appropriate order on the aforesaid representation, most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, unless there is no legal impediment. 5. In case it is found by the District Magistrate that he is not a competent authority, he will forward the same to the concerned authority who will take a decision in the matter. September 9, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyvrat Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Rajendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad