Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49736 (KAR)

SRI GURAPPA v. VELU MURUGAN P

MFA/2279/2013 · 2026-01-28

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4751 MFA No. 2279 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2279 OF 2013 (MV) BETWEEN: SRI GURAPPA S/O SANNAMARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC:SHEPHERD AND OWNER OF THE SHEEP, R/AT DUGGAVATHI VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. N M HANDRAL AND K. CHANDRAPPA., ADVOCATES(ABSENT)) AND: 1. VELU MURUGAN P S/O PERIYASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER OF THE LORRY, R/AT NAYANAR KPALYAM, KALLAKURCHI TQ, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE-600 124. 2. A MATHIVANAN MAJOR, S/O ARMUGAM, OWNER OF THE LORRY, R/AT NO.20, 1ST MAIN ROAD, K.P.N. EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 002. 3. RAYAL SUNDRAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court Of Karnatka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4751 MFA No. 2279 of 2013 1ST FLOOR, CENTER KPOINT, NEW COTTON MARKET, HUBLI BRANCH, HUBLI, DHARWAD-580 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3, V/O DTD:18.02.2015 NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS D/W) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED13.10.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO.45/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT IX, HARAPANAHALLI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant in the morning session stated that he gave no objection certificate about one month back, and thereafter, it was passed over. 2. Though this matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ and also passed over till afternoon, there is no representation. As the case pertains to the year 2013 and as the claimants are not interested to pursue the litigation with - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4751 MFA No. 2279 of 2013 due diligence, no purpose would be served in continuing the same. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE CS CT:NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46