- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:835 RSA No. 1737 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1737 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI SOMESHA S/O RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT HALEHAGARE VILLAGE MADHIHALLI HOBLI BELUR TALUK 573 115 HASSAN DISTRICT …APPELLANT [BY SRI JAGADEESH H T., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: SRI PUTTALAKSHMI W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT HALEHAGARE VILLAGE MADIHALLI POST BELUR TALUK 573115 HASSAN DISTRICT …RESPONDENT [BY SRI MURTHY D.L., ADV. FOR C/R IN CP NO.13634/2023] THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.08.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.17/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.09.2022 PASSED IN OS NO.269/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT BELUR. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:835 RSA No. 1737 of 2023 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 38