[2026:RJ-JP:14615] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8026/2025 Prabhati Lal Meena S/o Gulab Meena, Resident Of Village Chattarpura, Post Dantli, The. Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Santosh Kumar Meena S/o Late Sh. Kajodmal Meena, Resident Of Amteda, Dhani Banawali, Post Gothda, Bhandarej, Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 08/04/2026 1- ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr ifjoknh&izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk jkeuxfj;k] ftyk t;iqj 'kgj ¼iwoZ½ esa iathc) djok;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 210@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 341] 384] 420] 406] 120ch o 506 Hkk-na-la- dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA 2- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd orZeku ekeys esa /kkjk 323] 341 o 384 Hkk-na-la- ds tks vkjksi yxk;s x;s gSa os iw.kZr% feF;k gS] /kkjk 420 o 406 Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks lgh ekuk tkos rc Hkh fdlh Hkh :i esa vijk/k ?kfVr ugha gksrk gSA okLro esa vuko';d :i ls ncko cukus ds fy, feF;k vk/kkjksa ij ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ xbZ gS] tks dkuwuh izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS vkSj var esa mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA [2026:RJ-JP:14615] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-8026/2025] 3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSa] mijksDr vkjksiksa vFkok bl ;kfpdk ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ds laca/k esa vHkh vafre fu"d"kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrk] ;g vuqla/kku@fopkj.k dk fo"k; gS] vUr esa ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ifjoknh }kjk ;g vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS fd mlus oknxzLr Hkw[k.M fnukad 30-07-2014 dks iathd`r fodz; foys[k ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr ls [kjhn dj dCtk izkIr fd;kA fnukad 24-06-2022 dks ifjoknh viuk Hkw[kaM laHkkyus x;k rks vfHk;qDr us vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj Hkw[kaM ij uktk;t dCtk djus dh uh;r ls ifjoknh ds lkFk ekjihV dh] mldh pkjnhokjh rksM nh rFkk xkyh xykst dh vkSj Hkw[kaM ij dCtk djus dh /kedh nhA izdj.k esa /kkjk 420 o 406 Hkk-na-la- dk vkjksi curk gS ;k ugha] ;g fu"d"kZ bl LVst ij fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd ifjoknh us vius frrEck c;kuksa esa ekjihV dk vkjksi ugha yxk;k gSA 6- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be [2026:RJ-JP:14615] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-8026/2025] conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered." 7- blh izdkj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk (2002) 1 SCC 555 Kamaladevi Agarwal V. State of W.B. & Ors. ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. This Court has consistently held that the revisional or inherent powers of quashing the proceedings at the initial stage should be exercised sparingly and only where the allegations made in the complaint or the FIR, even if taken it at the face value and accepted in entirety, do not prima facie discolse the commission of an offence. Disputed and controversial facts cannot be made the basis for the exercise of the jurisdiction." 8- mijksDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd vuqla/kku dh LVst ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djkus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs le; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksi rFkk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fy, x;s cpko o vU; lkexzh dh lR;rk] fo'oluh;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa laf{kIr tkap vFkok laf{kIr fopkj.k vuqKs; ugha gSA orZeku ekeys esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gksa] ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ U;k;ky;hu izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx djus gsrq ntZ djk;h x;h gks] ,slk Li"V ekeyk ugha gS rFkk yxk;s x;s vkjksi vius vki esa vlaHkkO; gks] ,slh fLFkfr Hkh ugha gSA vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] os vuqla/kku dk fo"k; gks ldrs gSa rFkk ;fn vkjksi i= izLrqr gksrk gS rks cpko lk{; ds le; lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ek= vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx la;r rjhds ls o iw.kZ lko/kkuh ds lkFk [2026:RJ-JP:14615] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-8026/2025] visf{kr gSA lkekU; :i ls tc rd lqn`< vk/kkj ugha gksa] vuqla/kku izfdz;k dks jksdk tkuk vFkok ckf/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 9- mijksDr foospkukuqlkj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr djus gsrq /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 10- ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /30