- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20600 WP No. 2006 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, RESIDING AT NO. 78, MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA M.V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. THE THASILDHAR ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106. 4. SRI. SIDDAPPA Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20600 WP No. 2006 of 2024 S/O LATE KAKAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT MUTHAGATTI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. 5. SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. 6. SMT. S. GOWRAMMA W/O C CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 330, GOKULA LAYOUT, WARD NO. 08, ANEKAL TOWN, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. 7. SRI. C. GANESH BABU S/O C. CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 702, 7TH FLOOR, SUNCITY APARTMENTS, STAR BLOCK, SARJAPURA OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) CALL FOR THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20600 WP No. 2006 of 2024 RECORDS FROM R1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, IN REVISION PETITION NO. 304/2019-2020 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv, List No.2, Sl No.: 5