Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49703 (CAL)

SK NURUL AMIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16195/2026 · 2026-10-14

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L. 18 14.10.2026 Ct. No.2 Mujahid WPA 16195 of 2026 Sk. Nurul Amin Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Dilip Kumar Samanta Mr. Biswapriya Samanta …for the petitioner Mr. Samrat Mukherjee Mr. Atanu Basu Mr. Bikramjit Mandal …for the State Ms. Aishwarya Rajyashree …for the respondents nos. 3 and 4 1. Learned counsel for the State has filed the report. Let it be taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the STA, Jharkhand undertakes that the representation of the petitioner dated 23rd July, 2025 shall be considered and decided expeditiously after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard. 3. In view of the submissions made, let the Transport Commissioner, Government of Jharkhand, who is the counter signing authority may consider the representation dated 23rd July, 2025 expeditiously in accordance with law after giving the parties an 2 opportunity of being heard. The decision be communicated within two weeks of such order. 4. Since the affidavit has not been filed, the averments made in the petition are not deemed to have been admitted. 5. It is also pertinent to mention here, that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)