Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027862026 2026:GAU-AS:2762 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./429/2026 RAJ ALI S/O LT. SIRAJ ALI R/O VILL- DARBAR ROAD ALI, PRAGATI CHARIALI P.S.- SIVASAGAR DIST.- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR A AHMED,MISS. P M AHMED,U U KHAN,MR. M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 24.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for granting bail to the accused applicant who is in custody since 15.01.2026 in connection with Gaurisagar P.S. Case No. 01/2026 under Section 305(a)/331(3) of the BNS. 3. The FIR was lodged by one Rupom Borah on 13.01.2026, alleging that on 12.01.2026 at about 11:00 AM some miscreants entered his house and committed theft of cash amounting to Rs. 3,50,000/-, gold ornaments and one mobile phone without sim card. On receipt of the ejahar, police registered Gaurisagar P.S. Case No. 01/2026 under Section 305(a)/331(3) the BNS. 4. Upon investigation, the police on receive of connection through the mobile phone allegedly stolen by the accused applicant, on reaching his house, the police recovered the gold jewelleries and the mobile phone from the accused applicant. The accused applicant has already behind the bar for 41 days. 5. The learned counsel for the accused applicant prays for bail, submitting that the accused applicant has already spent 41 days behind the bars and has no criminal antecedents. 6. Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam, opposes the bail, submitting that although the gold ornaments have been recovered, the money is yet to be recovered and the investigation is still Page No.# 3/3 ongoing. 7. Considering the matter in it’s entirety, including the length of detention of the accused applicant, this Court is of the considered opinion that the accused applicant should be granted bail at this stage. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused applicant shall be released forthwith on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM, Sivsagar, subject to the following conditions: I. That the accused applicant shall co- operate with the investigation. II. The accused applicant shall not try to influence any witness that may be involved in the instant case. 8. In view of the aforesaid directions, the instant bail application is disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant