Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49692 (MAD)

Munuswamy v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/17808/2026 · 2026-07-09

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 Munuswamy S/o Veerasamy, South Street, Chinnakolliyur Village, Villupuram District ..Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police South Street, Chinnakolliyur Village Villupuram DistrictPagandaikuttusalai Police Station, Kallakurichi. Crime No.43 of 2026 ..Respondent/ Complainant Prayer:- Criminal Original is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.43 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: M/S. M P Saravanan For Respondent: MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1) (I) and 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (amendment ) Act 2024 in Crime No.43 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was selling liquor bottles without permission and illegally possessed 10 VORION 180 ml brandy bottles. Hence, a case has been registered. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner is having four previous cases, all of similar nature. 4. This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). The petitioner is having four previous cases of similar nature. The said antecedents are certainly prejudicial to the case of the petitioner and it appears that the petitioner has been repeatedly indulging in similar offences by misusing the liberty granted to him. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner does not deserve the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-07-2026 JRS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police Pagandaikuttusalai Police Station, Kallakurichi. Crime No.43 of 2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. JRS CRL OP No. 17808 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis