1 1 In the High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side 13.10.2026 Item No.220 Court No.21 MKP WPA/25384/2026 MD SANAULLAH AND ANR. VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Hamidur Rahaman, Mr. Parvej Islam. …….… for the Petitioners Mr. Mukunda Lal Sarkar …….for the State Mrs. Anamika Pandey. ……for the E.C.I 1. The petitioners have the EPIC No.SQP2088425 and KSM2187581. 2. The learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that deficit Court-fee has been paid and copy of the receipt has been filed, let it be kept with the record. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking an appropriate order be passed so that conscionable justice may be done and now the Learned advocate representing the petitioners seeks direction as to the fact that the appeal preferred before the Tribunal be disposed of at the earliest. 4. Heard the learned advocate and on perusal of the record and considering the submission of the 2 2 Learned advocate, it transpires that the petitioners have sought for early disposal of his grievance. 5. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case. 6. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal. 7. WPA 25384 of 2026 is disposed of. 8. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)