Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L17 09.10.2026 Bpg.
WPA No.2872 of 2026
Guru Pada Natuya Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ranajit Roy Mr. Md. Shakeel Khan Ms. Jane Alam. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Suryaneel Das Ms. Suchitra Sinha Chatterjee. …for the State.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das Mr. Bishal Maity Ms. Tithli Piplai. …for the respondent nos.4 and 5.
1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has lodged a complaint dated 21st January, 2026 before the Officer-in-Charge, Usthi Police Station, South 24 Parganas disclosing series of cognizable offences.
2. The petitioner states that the petitioner is an aged senior citizen who has been wrongfully dispossessed from his shop room. The petitioner is further threatened by the named accused persons along with certain antisocial elements in his locality.
3. Several prayers have been made in this writ petition which cannot be considered in the present jurisdiction.
2
4. Mr. Das, learned advocate representing the State submits that the reliefs claimed in the writ petition cannot be allowed. The petitioner may be relegated to competent court to ventilate his grievances.
5. Having considered the abovementioned pleadings of the writ petition and submissions of the parties, this Court is not inclined to pass extraordinary reliefs claimed in the writ petition.
6. The Officer-in-Charge, Usthi Police Station, South 24 Parganas, however, shall consider and/or look into the complaint dated 21st January, 2026 and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Officer-in-Charge, Usthi Police Station is directed to ensure that prompt action be taken, if any credible information regarding criminal acts committed against the petitioner is brought to the notice of the police station.
7. WPA 2872 of 2026 is disposed of without any order as to costs.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Anuj Singh, J.)