- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:854 RSA No. 1719 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1719 OF 2023 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHOBHA D SUVARNA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, W/O LATE DINAKAR C SUVARNA, R/A SHUBHADINBAREBAIL, YEYYADI, BEJAI POST, MANGALURU - 575004. 2. SHODHAN AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O LATE DINAKAR C SUVARNA, R/A SHUBHADINBAREBAIL, YEYYADI, BEJAI POST, MANGALURU - 575004. …APPELLANTS [BY SRI DATTA PRASAD G., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. T RAMACHANDRA RAO S/O T.V. RAO, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT VIJAY-KAMAL, D. NO. 17-17-1301/4, S.L. ,LOBO ROAD, ATTAVAR, MANGALORE-575001. 2. SMT. UMA V. SARALAYA W/O LATE VIJESH S, AGED MAJOR, R/AT KARIKE HOUSE, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:854 RSA No. 1719 of 2023 PANDESHWARA, MANGALORE - 575001. 3. SRI VIJITHA S S/O LATE VIJESH S, AGED MAJOR, R/AT KARIKE HOUSE, PANDESHWARA, MANGALORE - 575001. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2015 PASSED IN RA.NO.68/2008 PASSED BY THE 3RD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.04.2008 PASSED IN O.S.NO.120/2009 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALORE, D.K. AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS O.S.NO.120/2009 AND PASS SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER ORDERS AS DEEMED FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES IN THIS CASE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:854 RSA No. 1719 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for V time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 106