Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4966 (KAR)

SMT. MISRI DEVI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9619/2024 · 2026-04-17

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21379 WP No. 9619 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9619 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MISRI DEVI S/O GOPARAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.452/234/264 OPP YELLAMMA TEMPLE VARTHUR MAIN ROAD, VARTHUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 560 087 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. P A KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA INFRASTRUCTURE , PORT AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SAMPARKASOUDHA, 3RD FLOOR, OPP ORIYAN MALL DR RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21379 WP No. 9619 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. KRRANN/BHO.S/BSR-01/CR-4B/2022- 23 DATED 13/02/2023 BY THE R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-B SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF PETITIONERS PROPERTY BEARING NO. 452/234/264, SITUATED AT VARTHUR VILLAGE HOBLI TO AN EXTENT OF AREA 1482 SQ. FT. AS INDICATED IN PETITION SCHEDULE AFTER HOLDING THAT THE RESPONDENT CANNOT COMPEL THE PETITIONER TO FOREGO HER LAND AND BUILDINGS FOR THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY ACCEPTING THE SCHEME OF TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) IN LIEU OF THE MONETARY COMPENSATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Sri. P. A. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in the writ petition has been satisfied. In light of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of as not calling for any further adjudication. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP