PRITI DEVI @ PRITI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35325/2026 · 2026-09-07
Gautam Chowdhary
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35325 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel submits that in the instant case an F.I.R. has already been lodged in Case Crime No. 218 of 2026 under Section 87/137(2) of B.N.S. Police Station Amaria, District Pilibhit, and therefore, the instant petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned Standing Counsel.
3. In view of above, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous.
September 8, 2026 S.Ali Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Priti Devi @ Priti And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad