Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49643 (KAR)

SRI.SWAMYGOWDA v. SRI.KARIGOWDA

RSA/1192/2025 · 2026-02-05

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6958 RSA No. 1192 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1192 OF 2025 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.SWAMYGOWDA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O HANDRANGI VILLAGE, KONANURU HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 130. 2. SRI. SUBBEGOWDA, S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O HANDRANGI VILLAGE, KONANURU HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573130. 3. SRI. NAGEGOWDA, S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O HANDRANGI VILLAGE, KONANURU HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573130. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ROOPESHA B., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. KARIGOWDA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O HANDRANGI VILLAGE, KONANURU HOBLI, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6958 RSA No. 1192 of 2025 ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573130. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.04.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.9/2024 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.02.2024 PASSED IN OS NO.295/2015 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 5th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20