Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4964 (JHR)

RAJESH BASFOR ALIAS RAJESH RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2887/2026 · 2026-04-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10201] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2887 of 2026 ------ Rajesh Basfor @ Rajesh Ram, aged about 30 years, son of Late Jamuna Basfor @ Late Jamuna Ram resident of village- Baku Bigha, P.O. & P.S. Vishnupath, Gaya, Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 193 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111, 310(4), 310(5), 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25 (1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was preparing to commit dacoity in a jewelry shop in furtherance of common intention with the co- accused person and from the co-accused persons, illegally kept fire arms were recovered by the police. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the co- accused person has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 10.03.2026 in B.A. No.1317 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.10.2025 as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.193 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/04/2026 Amar/-