- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6472 RSA No. 1608 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1608 OF 2022 BETWEEN: JAGDEESH BABU S/O LATE JANAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O HONNESHWARA NILAYA 8TH CROSS, 2ND PARALLEL ROAD, S.S. PURAM TUMKUR - 572 102. …APPELLANT (BY SRI VIKYATH B., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SHILPA D/O LATE JANAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 2. VANDANA W/O MANMOHAN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 3. KALPANA W/O KYATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT HONNESHWARA NILAYA 8TH CROSS, 2ND PARALLEL ROAD, S.S. PURAM, TUMKUR 572 102. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6472 RSA No. 1608 of 2022 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2019 PASSED IN FDP NO.5/2014 BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU, AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.09.2022 IN RA.NO.21/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSSIONS JUDGE, TUMKUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Though, case was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Despite sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied, even cost ordered was not paid. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7