Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49626 (CAL)

RAMKRISHNA SARKAR AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3507/2026 · 2026-10-15

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.10.2026 DL-1 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 3507 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bidhannagar Cyber Crime Police Station Case No.123 of 2026 dated 14.09.2026 under Sections 318(2)/335/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, corresponding to GR Case No.1346 of 2026, now pending before the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bidhannagar, North 24 Parganas. And In the matter of: Ramkrishna Sarkar & Ors. ….petitioners Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sulagna Sarkar, Advocate … for the petitioners Mr. Parmanand Sharma, Ld. APP Mr. Debapratim Guha, Advocate Ms. Sharmistha Das, Advocate … for the State Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra, Advocate (through Video Conference) Ms. Upasana Banerjee, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. 2. Petitioners stand implicated in an alleged fraud. 3. Petitioners allegedly took money from the de facto complainant and did not refund the same. 4. Materials in the case diary suggest requirement of investigations. 5. Enlarging the petitioners on anticipatory bail is likely to affect the quality of investigations. 6. In such circumstances, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. 2 8. C.R.M. (A) 3507 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.15 12:40:18 +05'30'