Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49620 (KAR)

UME MARIYAM AFSHA v. M/S TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

MFA/5965/2024 · 2026-01-30

P Sree Sudha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5341 MFA No. 5965 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5965/2024 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. UME MARIYAM AFSHA W/O LATE BILAL MOHAMMED KHAN AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 2. SRI MOHAMMED AMANULLA KHAN S/O LATE MOHAMMED EHSANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3. SMT. SHABANA YASMEEN S/O MOHAMMED AMANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 4. KUM. AMINA MISBA D/O MOHAMMED AMANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 5. KUM. FATIMA HIBA D/O MOHAMMED AMANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.141, 4TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN JHBCS LAYOUT KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 078. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GURUDEV PRASAD K T., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court Of Karnatka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5341 MFA No. 5965 of 2024 AND: 1. M/S TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS MANAGER MOTOR CLAIMS HUB NO. 69,, 2ND FLOOR, J P AND JAMBUKESHWARA ARCADE NEAR ICICI 1ST SQUARE BENGALURU-560 052. 2. M/S T J N CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., NO. 15/1, ROYAL STREET ABBIGERE SHETTIHALLI BENGALURU-560 090. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE FOR R2, R1-SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15.04.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO. 795/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIII ACMM, MAYO HALL UNIT, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5341 MFA No. 5965 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo requesting this Court to dismiss the appeal as not pressed. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE CS CT:NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 96