- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4084 WP No. 23493 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23493 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: M/S FRONTIER SHELTERS PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR C. ANAND, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 422, 2ND FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. …PETITIONER (BY MS. VINUTHA YATTINAHALLI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAMA RAMACHANDRA IYER, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ADDRESS AT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TASHILDAR ADDRESS AT BANGALORE EAST TALUK K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. 3. THE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (RERA), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4084 WP No. 23493 of 2025 ADDRESS AT 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, 3RD CROSS, ROAD CSI COMPOUND, MISSION RD., SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ADDRESS AT. REVENUE HOUSE, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 5. THIRUAMLAI SELVAM ADDRESS AT NO. 71, GROUND FLOOR, RELIABLE LIFESTYLE LAYOUT, NEAR TO AMAATRA ACADEMY SCHOOL, BENGALURU - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. HARSHAL JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE EXECUTION OF THE IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING NO. 106/24- 25 DATED 01.07.2025 PASSED BY THE R4 AS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Sri. Harshal Joshi, learned counsel seeks to appear for respondent No.5. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4084 WP No. 23493 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 and the learned AGA equivocally submit that the petitioner is only challenging the notice issued by the Tahsildar, who is executing the orders passed by RERA. Learned counsels submit that unless the petitioner raises a challenge to the order passed by RERA or there is a stay order passed in respect of the said order, the petitioner shall not be permitted to challenge the notice issued by the Tahsildar. 3. There is substance in the submissions made by the learned counsels. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the orders passed by RERA or to seek an order of stay in respect of that order. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1