NARENDRA SINGH @ BHAIYO S/O HARDAYAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3687/2026 · 2026-04-17
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4960 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4960 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3687/2026 Narendra Singh @ Bhaiyo S/o Hardayal Singh, Age 39 Years, R/o Tikad, P.S. Hanuman Nagar, Dist. Bhilwara, (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 17/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 44/2026 registered at Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 69, 351(2) & 351(3) B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 08.02.2026 and there are no criminal antecedents registered against him. He further submits that it is a case of consensual relationship and the victim is a married lady, aged about 40 years; conclusion of trial will take its long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
[2026:RJ-JP:16153] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3687/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 08.02.2026 and there are no criminal antecedents registered against him; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Narendra Singh @ Bhaiyo S/o Hardayal Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/34