Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 496 (RAJ)

RAHUL S/O SHRI BHOORALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4043/2026 · 2026-03-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11251] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4043/2026 Rahul S/o Shri Bhooralal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Raiger Mo- halla, Police Station Kotwali, Sawaimadhopur District Sawimad- hopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail At Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amir Aziz For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/03/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0372/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS 2023 and 66D of IT Act, 2008 in F.I.R. against the order dated 05.03.2026 whereby learned Trial Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused-petitioner for the offences Sections 318(4), 319(2), 112(2), 61(2)A of BNS 2023 and 66D of IT Act, 2008 and under Section 42(3)(E), 42(6) of Telecommunication Act, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and he is in custody since 11.12.2025 Counsel further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter. Counsel also submit that trial of the case is [2026:RJ-JP:11251] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4043/2026] likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused-petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 11.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail pro- vided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) (each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /19