Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:7991
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2259 of 2026
----- Pawan Kumar Yadav, son of Uday Mahato, resident of village Shivnagar, PO Simrajor, PS Mohanpur, District Deoghar
… Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : None For the State
: Mr. S. K. Tiwari, Spl. PP
…......
02 /23.03.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(c) of the I.T. Act.
2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Heard, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order.
4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
5. Since the mobile phone recovered from the possession of this petitioner was used for committing cyber-crime which is apparent from the impugned order as links of the mobile number were found in the JMIS portal with acknowledgement number against the mobile number of mobiles recovered from the petitioner showing online financial fraud, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 175 of 2025,
2026:JHHC:7991
2
pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases Deoghar stands rejected.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
8. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after framing of the charge.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 23.03.2026 Tanuj/CP-3
Uploaded on 25.03.2026