THE NTI HOUSING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/24437/2024 · 2026-01-28
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49596 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49596 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4597 WP No. 24437 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 24437 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
THE NTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD BEING A REGISTERED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.84, ”SUN SMILE”, 1ST FLOOR, 8TH CROSS, SERPENTINE ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/CHIEF EXECUTIVE SRI PRATAPA CHAND RATHOD
…PETITIONER (BY SMT. NAYANA TARA B.G., ADV.) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION REPRESENTED BY ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY ROOM NO. 610, 6TH FLOOR, 3RD GATE, MS BUILDING BANGALORE - 560001.
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4597 WP No. 24437 of 2024
2.
JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BANGALORE DIVISION MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003.
3.
SRI P V SHIVA KUMAR S/O O PUTTAKAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT 8712, LAUREL CANYON ROAD IRVING, TEXAS 75063 USA
ALSO AT NO.19, (OLD NO. U-6) SP AVENUE ROAD SIDHANTHI BLOCK MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2, SRI. SAILESH S K, ADV. FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD 5.04.2024 PASSED BY R-2 IN CASE NUMBER GRB/MD/09/2022-23 PRODUCED AT ANNX-A, AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4597 WP No. 24437 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition with a liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Tribunal.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps for a period of 30 days from today.
5. All the contentions of the parties are kept open including limitation for dispute.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB