- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2516 WP No. 23492 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23492 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. FRONTIER SHELTERS PVT. LTD., A REAL ESTATE COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. C. ANAND, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 422, 2ND FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMA RAMACHANDRA IYER, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ADDRESS AT: MS BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TASHILDAR ADDRESS AT: BANGALORE EAST TALUK K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. 3. THE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (RERA), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADDRESS AT 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK 3RD CROSS, ROAD CSI COMPOUND, MISSION RD., SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027. Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2516 WP No. 23492 of 2025 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ADDRESS AT: REVENUE HOUSE, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 5. ASHISH KUMAR PANDEY ADDRESS AT NO. 52/2, III FLOOR, 9TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, PUTTENAHALLI, JP NAGARA, 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. HARSHAL JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SETTING ASIDE THE EXECUTION OF THE IMPUGNED NOTICE BEARING NO. 88/24- 25 DATED 01.07.2025 PASSED BY THE R4 AS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Sri. Harshal Joshi, learned counsel seeks to appear for respondent No.5. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 and the learned HCGP equivocally submit that the petitioner is only challenging the notice issued by the Tahsildar, who is executing the orders passed by RERA. Learned counsels - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2516 WP No. 23492 of 2025 submit that unless the petitioner raises a challenge to the order passed by RERA or there is a stay order passed in respect of the said order, the petitioner shall not be permitted to challenge the notice issued by the Tahsildar. 3. There is substance in the submissions made by the learned counsels. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the orders passed by RERA or to seek an order of stay in respect of that order. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2