Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49586 (MAD)

K.Balagurunathan v. The Commissioner

WP(MD)/18027/2026 · 2026-07-10

Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 10.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 K.Balagurunathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal For Disciplinary Proceedings, No.5/1-B, Vinayaga Nagar, Madurai-625 020. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 the 2nd respondent to conclude and dispose the disciplinary proceedings in Roc.No.A1/83/2023 (TDP.04/2023) dated 27.09.2023 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kharikharadas, For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinayak - for R1 Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to conclude and dispose the disciplinary proceedings in Roc.No.A1/83/2023 (TDP.04/2023) dated 27.09.2023 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard Mr.K.Kharikharadas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Vinayak, learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 3. Taking into consideration the innocuous nature of prayer sought in the present writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage without inviting any counter affidavit. 4. While the petitioner was working as Skilled Assistant Grade-II in the respondent corporation, he was subjected to disciplinary proceedings, by issuing a charge memo vide proceedings in ROC.NoA1/83/2023 (TDP.04/2023) dated 27.09.2023 and the same is pending for enquiry before the 2nd respondent. Though the said charge memo has been issued as early as in the year 2023, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no much progress in the said proceedings and because of the pendency of the said proceedings, the petitioner is vehemently affected in his service prospects. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the enquiry proceedings are pending against the petitioner for the past three years, this Court is of the considered view that it is a fit case where appropriate 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 directions should be issued for conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings at the earliest. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings in ROC.NoA1/83/2023 (TDP.04/2023) dated 27.09.2023 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 10.07.2026 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No rm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 To 1.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal For Disciplinary Proceedings, No.5/1-B, Vinayaga Nagar, Madurai-625 020. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR , J. RM W.P(MD) No.18027 of 2026 10.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis