Mathava Durai P v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By the superintendent of police, Dindigul district
CRL OP(MD)/13700/2026 · 2026-07-08
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49583 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49583 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP(MD) No.13700 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.13700 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD) No.13421 of 2026 P.Mathava Durai ... Petitioner Vs
1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Dindigul.
3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai - 600 008..
4. A.Aathikannan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records relating to the CC No.614 of 2025 in crime no.17/2024 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul west and to set aside the charge sheet filed therein and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct a reinvestigation / De Novo investigation by an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and further direct to file a fresh final report before the jurisdictional Court within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD) No.13700 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Akil For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 to R3
ORDER The present petition has been filed by the first accused in CC No. 614 of 2025 in Cr.No.615 of 2025 seeking to set aside the charge sheet and to
order fresh investigation. 2.The petitioner along with the other accused persons is charged with the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(3), 296 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. Perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioner has collected huge sum of money and has handed over to A2 for procuring a job. The petitioner and A2 claimed to have political contacts and they have collected money from the general public under the guise of procuring employment. 3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, his wife has also paid a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- for procuring the job and therefore, she is also a victim. However, the said angle has not been investigated by the respondent police. Hence, he has prayed for setting aside the charge sheet and for conducting a fresh investigation. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD) No.13700 of 2026 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 5.The present contention of the petitioner is that his wife is also a victim and she had paid a sum of Rs.5,00,000 to A2. However, for the past two years, no such complaint has been launched by the wife of the petitioner herein and only after the filing of the charge sheet, such a stand has been taken by A1/petitioner. In such circumstances, this Court does not find any reason to
order for a De Nova investigation. 6.In view of the above facts, there is no merits in the petition. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 08.07.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No PNM 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD) No.13700 of 2026 To The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Dindigul.
3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai - 600 008.. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD) No.13700 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR
, J.
PNM
ORDER MADE IN Crl.OP.(MD)No.13700 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD) No.13421 of 2026 08.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis