- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3973 RSA No. 1548 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1548 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. MRS SIDILA PINTO AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 2. REETA LOBO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. ANJELINA PINTO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 4. PAUL J PINTO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 5. THERESA M PINTO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 6. EDWIN PINTO AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 7. LEO STANELY PINTO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 8. ALWIN PINTO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO.1 IS THE WIFE AND 2 TO 8 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE MARIAN PINTO R/AT DEVASYA HOUSE VITTAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. - 574 211 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. AKHIL S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3973 RSA No. 1548 of 2022 AND: 1. ANDREW PINTO (SINCE DEAD) W/O LATE ROSARIO PINTO R/AT DEVASYA HOUSE VITTAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K 1A. MRS LILLY PAIS W/O LATE ANDREW PINTO AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT DEVASYA HOUSE VITTAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K 1B. PRECILLA PINTO D/O LATE ANDREW PINTO W/O VINCENT PINTO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT KELLERIMAR SARAPADY VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K 1C. JACINTHA PINTO D/O LATE ANDREW PINTO AGED AOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT A C CONVENT 94 HILL ROAD BANDRA MUMBAI 1D. ANITHA LUCY PINTO D/O LATE ANDREW PINTO W/O PRAVEEN STEPHEN PINTO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT LOBO COMPOUND THARASI KUNDAPUR TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT 1E. SUNITHA JANE PINTO D/O LATE ANDREW PINTO W/O KAVIN NOEL PEREIRA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NEAR AGRAR CHURCH BANTWAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3973 RSA No. 1548 of 2022 1F. FRANCIS PREETHAM PINTO S/O LATE ANDREW PINTO AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT DEVASYA HOUSE VITTAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D K …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1A TO C) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.4/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL D.K, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.11.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.223/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL.D.K., AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52