14.10.2026 cm ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2275 of 2026 sl no.29 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Haringhata P.S. Case No. 193/2026 dated 03.04.2026 Sections 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. Allowed In Re : Ashoke Ghosh. ….. petitioner Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Ms. Roma Roy …… for the petitioner Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal Ms. Deblina Bhattacharjee …. for the State 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted the petitioner to be in custody for 193 days on the ground of false implication as he had not been involved in the alleged offence. 3. The learned advocate representing the State submitted that the petitioner though not named in the complaint had been ascribed as one of the accused in the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. It was further submitted though the charge-sheet has been filed, however, charges have not been framed. 4. The narrative of the complaint and the statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS as well as apart from the present petitioner and the scooters to have been stationed at his house did not directly indicate any overact on the present petitioner apparently, accordingly the prayer for bail is considered and allowed. 2 4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kalyani, Nadia on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition petitioner shall meet the local police station thrice in a week until further orders. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police station. 5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. 6. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record. 7. The application being CRM(M) No. 2275 of 2026 is disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)