Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4957 (BOM)

MARUTI S/O BADUJI RATHOD v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. SEC. WATER RESOURCES DEPT. MUMBAI AND ORS.

WP/6598/2026 · 2026-08-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 106) WP 6598-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6598 OF 2026 MARUTI S/O BADUJI RATHOD VS STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECY. WATER RESOURCES DEPT. MUMBAI AND ORS. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri K.V.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Shri A.J.Gohokar, AGP for respondent/State. CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 28/08/2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The prayer made in this petition is for a direction to the respondents authorities to initiate and expedite the process of acquisition and grant compensation in respect of the land admeasuring 1.32 H.R., Gat No. 39, Survey No. 119, situated at village Movada, Tah. Ghatanji, Distt. Yavatmal. Consequential reliefs have also been sought. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, fairly submits that the suit was filed and in the Written Statement, a stand was taken by the respondents authorities, which is contrary to the prayer made in this petition. 4. Be that as it may, since, as on date, the issue is not decided, we direct the respondent no. 2 to treat the present petition as a representation and decide the issue in accordance with law, after granting an opportunity of being 2026:BHC-NAG:11273-DB 2 106) WP 6598-26.odt heard, if necessary, to the affected person, within a period of eight weeks from today. 5. The decision taken be communicated to the petitioners within a period of one week thereafter. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to produce a copy of the present petition along with a copy of the order passed today before the concerned authority, within a period of one week from today. 7. At this juncture, it is necessary to state that, when the respondent authorities will deal with the issue raised in the writ petition, they shall not be influenced by the findings given in the civil proceedings, and the prayer made in this petition shall be decided independently. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) B.T.K. Signed by: Mr. B.T. Khapekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/08/2026 20:26:38