Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:782 WP No. 52210 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 52210 OF 2019 (LB-UC) BETWEEN:
SRI NARAYANAPPA GOWDA S/O CHANNAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, KALLERI HOUSE, KARAYA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. - 574 214. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN B S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANGALURU TALUK D.K.DISTRICT - 574 145.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K.DISTRICT - 574 214.
3.
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER THANNIRUPANTHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH KARAYA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 217.
4. PRESIDENT THANNIRUPANTHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH KARAYA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 217.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.CHANDINI SINGH, HCGP FOR R1 & R2;
SRI.KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:782 WP No. 52210 of 2019
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO RESTRAIN THE R-3 AND 4 FROM CONSTRUCTING THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION FILED BY PETITIONER TO THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE R-3 AND 4 FOR CONVERSION OF LAND AS PER ANNEXURE-F, ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to restrain the respondents No.3 and 4 from constructing the commercial building in schedule property by considering the representation submitted by the petitioner as per Annexure-A.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:782 WP No. 52210 of 2019
b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to consider the objection filed by petitioner to the application filed by the respondent 3 and 4 for conversion of land as per Annexure-F. c) Issue any other appropriate writ order or direction deemed fit to be granted including the direction for cost.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accepting the said submission, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46