Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49561 (KAR)

SMT. RAZIYA KHATUN v. SRI MOHAMMED MUJASSIR

RSA/1570/2022 · 2026-01-29

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5010 RSA No. 1570 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1570 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. RAZIYA KHATUN W/O LATE ABDUL LATHIF SAB AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS R/O HONGANOOR VILLAGE CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KANTEPPA HULEPPA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI MOHAMMED MUJASSIR S/O LATE ABDUL LATHIF SAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O HONGANOOR VILLAGE CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.45/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHANNAPATNA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.147/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, CHANNAPATNA. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5010 RSA No. 1570 of 2022 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation for appellant. Matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, even on cost, office objections remained un-complied and cost is also not paid. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9