Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5010 RSA No. 1570 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1570 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SMT. RAZIYA KHATUN W/O LATE ABDUL LATHIF SAB AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS R/O HONGANOOR VILLAGE CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KANTEPPA HULEPPA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI MOHAMMED MUJASSIR S/O LATE ABDUL LATHIF SAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O HONGANOOR VILLAGE CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.45/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHANNAPATNA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.147/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, CHANNAPATNA.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5010 RSA No. 1570 of 2022
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation for appellant. Matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, even on cost, office objections remained un-complied and cost is also not paid. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9