Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49560 (KAR)

SMT. SHWETHA v. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA

RSA/1586/2022 · 2026-01-30

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5328 RSA No. 1586 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1586 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. SHWETHA W/O SHIVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS C/O GIRISH R/O GANADHINAGARA CHIKMAGALURU - 577 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE CHANDREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/O HOSABYLU, HAVVALLI VILLAGE ALDUR HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 101. 2. SMT. SUNITHA W/O PADMESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O HARANAHALLI VILLAGE ANOOR POST, VASTHARE HOBLI CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5328 RSA No. 1586 of 2022 AND DISTRICT - 577 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR S.K, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.10.2022 PASSED IN RA.No.72/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.12.2019 PASSED IN FDP No.6/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU, ACCEPTING THE COMMISSIONER REPORT FILED UNDER SECTION 54 R/W ORDER 21 RULE 35 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant has filed a Memo stating that parties to appeal have settled their dispute during pendency of Final Decree Proceedings, and therefore, appeal would not survive for consideration. 2. Taking Memo on record, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5328 RSA No. 1586 of 2022 3. In view of disposal of Appeal, pending interlocutory application is also dismissed as unnecessary. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13