COCP-982 IN THE HI 106 Jyoti Bala an Sonali Giri a CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Punjab and following di 2. reproduced been compli 982-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o ala and others Versus Giri and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. PP Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 19.08.2025 (Annex CWP-23854-2025, titled as ‘Jyoti and others’ whereby the writ petiti ing direction:- “xxx xxx 3. In view of the above and merits of the case, this petition direction to the respondents notice dated 21.07.2025, tak judgment, within a period of 6 no reason to believe the autho just, fair and reasonable ma nothing and hearing offered to grant the benefit forthwith. Nee adverse to their interest, the sa the petitioners shall be free to s Learned counsel for the petition uced above, the order dated 19.08.2 omplied with by the respondents till d ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-982-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA e for the petitioners. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Jyoti Bala and others vs. State of petition was disposed of with the xxx and without commenting upon the ition is hereby disposed of with a nts to decide the legal demand taking note of the aforesaid of 6 months, which this Court has uthorities would not address in a manner. Upon doing so, after ed to them and if found entitled, . Needless to say, if the orders are e same shall contain reasons and to seek legal redress thereupon.” etitioners despite the clear direction 08.2025 (Annexure P-1) has not till date. ging Writ e of the he a nd id as a ter d, re nd tion not RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-982 3. the order da Order dated present petit 4. Court is tak learned coun 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. Speaking Or action still su 8. 9. 09.03.2026 rishu 982-2026 -2- Per Contra, learned counsel for der dated 19.08.2025 stands duly c dated 27.02.2026 has been passed. As t petition. Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioners would be at libe ing Order, in accordance with law, i still survives. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable sel for the respondents submits that uly complied with; and Speaking As such, nothing survives in the r dated 27.02.2026 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid law, if so advised or any cause of any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No king the r in d to are sed said e of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.