Murugan v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP(MD)/14260/2026 · 2026-07-14
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49551 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49551 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/07/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026 Murugan, S/o. Vaikuntam, No. 68, 5th Street, Ktc Nagar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.. ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Alwarthirunagari Police Station, Thoothukudi District Cr.No. 180/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.U.Parivendan for Mr.C.Venkatesh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-8B For Bail in crime no 180/2026 on the file of the Respondent Police 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner /Accused No.2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 49, 296(b), 109 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, and Section 25(1)(a) Arms Act, in Crime No.180 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joining hands with the other accused attempted to attack the defacto complainant with an Aruval and also criminally intimidated him with dire consequences. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no one sustained any injury. The petitioner has no previous case. He is in custody from 26.06.2026 and ready to abide any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed bail for the 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026 petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel for the State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner has no previous cases. Investigation is still pending. No one sustained any injury. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no one sustained any injury and the petitioner has no previous cases and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD).
No.14260 of 2026 Magistrate No.II, Srivaikundam, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivaikundam, on all working days at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation before the respondent Police; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026 appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (K R S J)
14.07.2026 VSG TO 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivaikundam. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Alwarthirunagari Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.14260 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR,J., vsg
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14260 of 2026 Date : 14/07/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis