Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49545 (CAL)

SHOUVIK BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/2090/2026 · 2026-10-13

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09. 15.10.2026. Court No.33. (Pritam) (OP) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (M) 2090 of 2026. In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. In the matter of: - Shouvik Biswas. ..…petitioner. Mr. Kaustav Shome, Ms. Supriti Sarkhel. ......for the State. 1. It has brought to the notice of this Court that as the names of the learned advocates representing the State have not been provided on the earlier order dated 13th October, 2026, the same could not have been recorded. 2. Let the names of Mr. Kasutav Shome and Ms. Supriti Sarkhel, learned advocates representing the State be recorded in the order dated 13th October, 2026. The department shall carry out the correction in the said order. The other portion of the order shall remain unaltered. 3. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)