Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49543 (KAR)

SRI H D GANGAIAH v. SMT NAGARATHNAMMA

RSA/1547/2015 · 2026-01-30

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5410 RSA No. 1547 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1547 OF 2015 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI H D GANGAIAH S/O LATE DODDACHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, HINDU, 2. SRI. CHANNEGOWDA S/O H.D. GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HINDU, 3. 3(A) 3(B) 3(C) SRI.THIMMEGOWDA DIED , REP. BY HIS LRS SMT. NAGARATHNA H.S. W/O LATE SRI. THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SMT. LAKSHMI H.T. W/O SRI. GANGARAJU D/O LATE SRI. THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS KUMARI VATSALA H.T. D/O LATE SRI. THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HONNADEVIPURA MADURE HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5410 RSA No. 1547 of 2015 4. SRI. DEVARAJU S/O H.D.GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, 5. SRI. BYREGOWDA S/O H.D.GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, HINDU, 6. SMT. SEETHAMMA D/O H.D. GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, HINDU, ALL ARE R/AT HONNADEVIPURA, MADURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S. R. SREEPRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR A1, A2 & A4 TO A6) AND: 1. SMT NAGARATHNAMMA W/O GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HINDU R/AT MALLAPPANAHALLI, KUDURU HOBLI, SIGINRIPURA POST, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 2. SRI.DEVANANDA S/O H.D. GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, HINDU R/AT MALLAPPANAHALLI, KUDURU HOBLI, SIGINRIPURA POST, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI. N. REVANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 (NOC)] - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5410 RSA No. 1547 of 2015 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.07.2015 PASSED IN RA NO.28/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, AT DODDABALLAPUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND AFFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.04.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.402/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC AT DODDABALLAPUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo for withdrawal stating that the appellants were the defendants before the trial Court. The appeal is filed against concurrent findings of both the courts. The matter is settled through Lok Adalat on 23.04.2025 in connected O.S.No.605/2025 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddaballapur and a copy of the compromise decree is produced along with the memo. 2. Memo is placed on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5410 RSA No. 1547 of 2015 3. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending Interlocutory application/s, if any, do not survive for consideration and they are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV