Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3192 RSA No. 1161 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1161 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI KADIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE MUGI KADIRAPPA, R/AT DWARAPALLI VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. C VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, R/AT SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK. …RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.05.2025 PASSED IN RA.NO.88/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.06.2015 PASSED IN OS.NO.311/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI, AND ETC.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3192 RSA No. 1161 of 2025
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 63