CRWP-4616 IN THE (116 ) MARZEENA STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at representation 2. submitted tha 10.04.2026 be P-4) raising th same has not y further submit 4616-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH EENA AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Kripal Singh, Advocate for th Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.1 and 2 to protect rs at the hands of respondent No. tation dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 before the Senior Superintendent o sing their grievances as mentioned in s not yet been considered and no actio submitted that at this stage, the peti NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH
CRWP-4616-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
e for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the ect the life and liberty of the t No.3 and to take action on their ure P-4). ed counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on dent of Police, Pathankot (Annexure ned in the present petition but the o action has been taken thereon. He e petitioners would be satisfied if ners
f the g the the their has on xure t the . He AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4616 appropriate di of Police, Pat petitioners and 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec
23.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4616-2026 (O&M) (2) iate directions are issued to responden e, Pathankot to decide the aforesai rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senio n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set o ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 10.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   pondent No.2-Senior Superintendent oresaid representation filed by the reon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

dent the ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.