Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6962 RSA No. 1153 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1153 OF 2025 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHELUVARAJU S/O LATE SINGRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT BYRAPATNA VILLAGE, MALUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TQ., RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 159. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHASKAR C.R., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SMT. BETTAMMA W/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANKALGERE VILLAGE, MALUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 159. …RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.03.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.31/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.04.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.21/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6962 RSA No. 1153 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 4th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11