27.02.2026 Court No.39 DL/Item No.-8 [Milan, A.R. (Ct)] In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side SA 314 of 1968 INDRA CHANDRA SHAW VS KANGALI CHARAN PURKAIT & ORS. Despite direction for service of administrative notice neither the appellant nor has the respondent appeared before the Court when the matter was called on for several times. On perusal of the note given by the Department, it appears that the administrative notices were dispatched to the appellant and the respondents at their addresses as stated in the cause title of the second appeal. Neither the appellant nor the respondents have been found to be there in the address as indicated in the cause title. The undelivered packets containing the postal articles dispatched to the appellant and the respondents have been returned back with an endorsement “Insufficient Address/Item Invoiced” or have left. Items dispatched were received by Shyamal Kumar Purkait and Sushanta Purkait but no one has appeared. 2 The service attempted on the recorded advocates has also been fruitless for insufficient particulars. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, as no one has turned up either to represent the appellant or respondent, though the matter has been appearing in the list, the matter is dismissed considering the fact that with the passage of time no one is interested to either proceed or oppose the matter. Let the records of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court, if any, are lying in this Court, be returned to the appropriate Court with a copy of this order. (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)