KALIDAS PAL & ANR v. TAPAN BAIDYA @ TAPAN KUMAR BAIDYA & ORS
MAT/2080/2016 · 2026-10-09
Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49528 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49528 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
55 09.10.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das MAT 2080 of 2016
Kalidas Pal & Ors. Vs Tapan Baidya @ Tapan Kumar Baidya & Ors.
1. None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call.
2. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the matter would be taken up for hearing again today.
3. The matter was adjourned on 6 October 2026 when the parties were unrepresented. In view of the non- appearance of the parties, MAT 2080 of 2016 stands dismissed for default.
4. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
[Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.]
[Atarup Banerjee, J.]