DR. TANUJA.R v. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
WP/21791/2023 · 2026-01-14
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49504 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49504 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2352 WP No. 21791 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 21791 OF 2023 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
DR. TANUJA. R D/O RAJAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NAGANAYAKANAHALLI MARSUR, AENKAL BENGALURU 562106
2.
DR MAHADEV VIJAY POKALE S/O VIJAY MAHADEV POKALE AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT DOCTORS QUARTERS BVV SANGHA S S NIJALINGAPPA MEDICAL COLLEGE BAGALKOT 587101 …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRADEEP PATIL., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2352 WP No. 21791 of 2023
AND:
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560041 REP BY ITS REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) …RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESPONDENT TO CONDUCT THE REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER SCRIPTS OF THE PETITIONERS BY EXTENDING THE BENEFIT OF THE ORDINANCE TO MAKE IT APPLICABLE TO SITUATION WHEREVER THE DIFFERENCE OF MARKS AWARDED BY THE VALUATORS IS MORE THAN EQUAL TO 15 PERCENT AND NOT WITH REGARD TO THE TOTAL MARKS PRESCRIBED TO THAT PARTICULAR SUBJECT IN VIEW OF THE SETTLED POSITION OF LAW AT THE HANDS OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP NO. 31335/2019, DTD 10.08.2020 AFFIRMED IN WP NO.
231/2021 DTD 11.02.2021 SINCE AFFIRMED IN WA NO.
771/2021 DTD 12.08.2021 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D, E AND H.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: *****
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2352 WP No. 21791 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. The submission is placed on record.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28