132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-13322-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.03.2026 Sourabh ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and Others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G Haryana. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel submits that the challan has already been presented in the present case, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. March 12, 2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.13 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document