Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49480 (CAL)

DURJAY KUMAR MAHATO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25893/2026 · 2026-10-14

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14-10-2026 Item No.4 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA No.25893 of 2026 Durjay Kumar Mahato -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahata Mr. Amit Bikram Mahata Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata …for the petitioner Ms. Smita Pal Mr. Vaibhav Prakash …for the State Mr. Debashis Saha Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal Ms. Sucheta Pal Mr. Jyotishman Sarkar …for State Bank of India 1. Learned counsels for both the parties submit, on instructions, that the grievance of the petitioner for which this writ petition was filed has already been redressed by the authority. 2. The petitioner has been impleaded as the nominee of the consumer, since deceased, and the amount has already been transferred in his favour. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. 4. All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 5. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available to the parties. [Amrita Sinha, J] 2