Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4948 (KAR)

SMT JANAKI S R v. MR CHANDRASHEKAR

CCC/1521/2025 · 2026-04-25

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22771-DB CCC No. 1521 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1521 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. JANAKI S.R. D/O LATE S.K. RAJA RAO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NO.606 KHB COLONY HOOTAGALLI BELAVADI POST MYSURU - 570 018 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SUBRAMANYA R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NARASIMHARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. CHANDRASHEKAR THE COMMISSIONER HOOTAGALLI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL HOOTAGALLI MYSURU - 570 018 2. SRI SURESH KUMAR CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIJAYANAGAR MYSURU - 570 018 …ACCUSED Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22771-DB CCC No. 1521 of 2025 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.M.ANANDA.,ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED No.1; SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA FOR ACCUSED No.2 & PRO-FORMA RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO TAKE THE COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN VIEW OF THEIR DELIBERATE DISRESPECT INTENTION SHOWN TOWARDS THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 27.01.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.1978/2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22771-DB CCC No. 1521 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.1978/2025. 2. In terms of the said order, the interim orders were granted as prayed for till the next date of hearing. This Court is informed that the said interim order is continuing. 3. The complainant had sought the following interim relief: "That, the pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, the petitioner humbly prays that, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 not to carry any development work in forming the road and drainage in Sy.No.69/2 of Belavadi Village, Elavala hobli, Mysore Taluk and District measuring to an extent of 5 acres 12 guntas till the disposal of this petition in the interest of justice and equity." 4. The accused No.1 (who was arrayed as respondent No.5 in the writ petition) has filed an affidavit affirming that it has not disobeyed the interim order passed by this Court; it has not issued any order for any further development work to be carried on by the contractor. The accused has also enclosed photographs with the affidavit indicating the condition of the road as it was in existence - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22771-DB CCC No. 1521 of 2025 prior to the order, disobedience of which is alleged. They confirm that the said photographs which are annexed as annexures-R2(a) to R2(d) were filed on 12.09.2024 in W.P.No.13351/2024. 5. The learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the same. It is thus evident that the road did exist prior to the order, the disobedience of which is alleged. 6. The accused also states that the complainant had through his henchmen closed the road by dumping construction debris. He also enclosed photographs showing that debris thrown on the road in question. 7. In our view, the complainant cannot take advantage of the ad-interim orders by disturbing the status-quo as it existed on the said day. However, we leave it open for the accused to agitate the said issue before the learned Single Judge. 8. In the given circumstances, we are not persuaded to accept that there is any wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court or any proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are required to be initiated against the accused. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22771-DB CCC No. 1521 of 2025 9. The complaint is, accordingly, closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12