AJAY KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS
CRLP/21548/2026 · 2026-09-08
Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Siddhartha Varma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21548 of 2026 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State-respondents.
2. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report dated 23.08.2026 giving rise to Case Crime No.0132 of 2026, under Sections 125, 351(3) and 352 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, Police Station - Mohana, District - Siddhartha Nagar, but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioner confines his relief to grant of protection under section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
3. We have perused the the First Information Report, which prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315.
4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted.
5. However, considering the fact that all offences mentioned in the present case are punishable with a term up to 7 years, the authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
6. It is expected of the police not to harass the petitioner till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation.
7. The writ petition, accordingly, is disposed of. September 9, 2026 vijay krishna Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ajay Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad