Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.10.2026 ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2108 of 2026 sl no. 45 cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station
Case No. 203 of 2025 dated 10.03.2025 Sections 109/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And Rejected In Re : Biswajit Rabidas. ….. petitioner
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Soukteya Ganguly
…… for the petitioner Mr. Palash Chandra Podder Ms. Anindita Mukherjee
…… for the State
Mr. Debapriya Samanta
…. for the De-facto complainant
1. The learned advocate petitioner submitted the charges to have been framed till date.
2. The learned advocate representing de-facto complainant is present and opposed the prayer for bail.
3. The learned advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground of severity alleged offences.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned advocates representing the respective parties as well as the materials on record, gruesomeness of the alleged offences, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. The Trial Court is to frame the charges within 21st December, 2026 and a compliance report be filed to that effect on behalf of the prosecution.
2
6. The learned advocate representing the State is to instruct the concerned learned advocate representing the prosecution appearing before the concerned Trial Court to assist the Court in framing the charges.
7. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2116 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)