Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4946 (RAJ)

SANGMESH S/O SHRI DHANRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5111/2026 · 2026-04-16

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15803] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5111/2026 Sangmesh S/o Shri Dhanraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 7/2, Basawa Temple, Adpost, Kotgyal, Police Station Kamal Nagar, District Bidar, Kotgyal Karnatak. (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma Mr. Lokesh Gopaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.17/2025 registered at Police Station Dooni, District Tonk for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 65, 66, 66C, 66D and 43 of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsels for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that on the statement of the principal offender Neeraj, the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of false and concocted grounds. He again submits that principal accused Neeraj has been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of [2026:RJ-JP:15803] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5111/2026] this Court vide order dated 08.12.2025. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. It is submitted that the matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 27.03.2026. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with principal accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sangmesh S/o Shri Dhanraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/35